In this research, which has been carried out with a library and descriptive-analytical method,
the semantic implications of the paradoxes of the state of poverty and the free servant in the
poetry of Moulavi and Hafez are investigated. The purpose of this research is to highlight the
similarities of two poets' thoughts in the use of industry (paradox). It should also be determined
what methods Hafez and Moulavi have used in creating meaning in the combination of the
paradox of the free slave and the state of poverty. The result obtained from this research is that
Hafez and Moulavi have similar thoughts in many ways in using the paradox industry of the
state of poverty and the free servant, and their difference is in the aesthetic use of paradox, and
the paradox in Moulavi and Hafez is more semantic than synthetic, and the two poets have also
used other techniques such as simile, metaphor and irony to convey the mystical concepts of the
paradox of the free slave and the state of poverty.
|